- Research
- Published:
Public health economic modelling in evaluations of salt and/or alcohol policies: a systematic scoping review
樱花视频 volume听25, Article听number:听82 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Public health economic modelling is an approach capable of managing the intricacies involved in evaluating interventions without direct observational evidence. It is used to estimate potential long-term health benefits and cost outcomes. The aim of this review was to determine the scope of health economic models in the evaluation of salt and/or alcohol interventions globally, to provide an overview of the literature and the modelling methods and structures used.
Methods
Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, and EconLit, and complemented with citation searching of key reviews. The searches were conducted between 13/11/2022 and 8/11/2023, with no limits to publication date. We applied a health economic search filter to select model-based economic evaluations of public health policies and interventions related to alcohol consumption, dietary salt intake, or both. Data on the study characteristics, modelling approaches, and the interventions were extracted and synthesised.
Results
The search identified 1,958 articles, 82 of which were included. These included comparative risk assessments (29%), multistate lifetables (27%), Markov cohort (22%), microsimulation (13%), and other (9%) modelling methods. The included studies evaluated alcohol and/or salt interventions in a combined total of 64 countries. Policies from the UK (23%) and Australia (18%) were the most frequently evaluated. A total of 58% of the models evaluated salt policies, 38% evaluated alcohol policies, and only three (4% of included modelling studies) evaluated both alcohol- and salt-related policies.
The range of diseases modelled covered diabetes and cardiovascular disease-related outcomes, cancers, and alcohol-attributable harm. Systolic blood pressure was a key intermediate risk factor in the excessive salt-to-disease modelling pathway for 40 (83%) of the salt modelling studies. The effects of alcohol consumption on adverse health effects were modelled directly using estimates of the relative risk of alcohol-attributable diseases.
Conclusions
This scoping review highlights the substantial utilisation of health economic modelling for estimating the health and economic impact of interventions targeting salt or alcohol consumption. The limited use of combined alcohol and salt policy models presents a pressing need for models that could explore their integrated risk factor pathways for cost-effectiveness comparisons between salt and alcohol policies to inform primary prevention policymaking.
Background
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and cancers, are caused, to some extent, by modifiable risk factors such as unhealthy diets, excessive salt intake, harmful use of alcohol, and physical inactivity [1]. The excessive intake of dietary salt accounts for a large increase in hypertension prevalence since it is associated with an increase in systolic blood pressure [2]. The unhealthy consumption of alcohol has also previously been linked to acute and chronic changes in systolic blood pressure, and studies suggest that alcohol consumption can cause hypertension in heavy drinkers [3]. These two diet-related risk factors for hypertension and non-communicable diseases are therefore responsible for significant health and economic burden globally [1]. One way to reduce this burden is by implementing public health policies to control the consumption of these risk factors in the population [1, 4].
Health economic modelling has widely been used to generate scientific evidence on the costs and outcomes of dietary salt-reduction interventions and alcohol policies, aiding the evaluation and planning of dietary and other public health strategies [5]. Recent reviews have focused on health economic models for population-level dietary policies or alcohol policies, offering policymakers an overview of available health economic models to adapt or implement [6,7,8]. However, some of these reviews have excluded interventions at the primary care level and have not examined models addressing both salt and alcohol together. To our knowledge, no review has comprehensively explored the scope of health economic models evaluating policies targeting excessive dietary salt intake, alcohol consumption, or both. Identifying and understanding the scope of models addressing both salt and alcohol consumption will support the evaluation of interventions for efficient resource allocation and priority setting, while offering insights into common modelling approaches and health outcomes to inform the development of joint models targeting both risk factors.
This study systematically reviews the literature to identify health economic modelling studies evaluating public health interventions or policies targeting the harmful alcohol use and/or excessive intake of dietary salt. The aim is to assess the global scope and volume of these studies, provide an overview of their modelling structures, and analyse the role of intermediate risk factors in the modelling of salt or alcohol consumption to related health outcomes.
Methods
Study design
The scoping review was conducted following the reporting standards in the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [9]. A systematic scoping review aims to 鈥渕ap the key concepts underpinning a research area and the main sources and types of evidence available鈥 [10]. For this scoping review, we defined public health economic models as decision analytic models or mathematical tools used in economic evaluations to compare and synthesise evidence on costs and health benefits [11].
Search strategy
A comprehensive search strategy was developed and used to identify all potentially relevant peer-reviewed studies published in English. The search strategy was tested, refined and subsequently used to conduct systematic searches in the following electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE (via Ovid), and EconLit (via Ovid). The search was first performed on 13/11/2022, with an update search conducted on 8/11/2023 (see Additional file 1). The search covered publications from 01 January 1990 to the updated search date (i.e., 8/11/2023). The search terms utilised four broad categories of terms, combined using Boolean operators: (salt OR alcohol) AND economic evaluation AND modelling. The search terms used were complemented by MeSH terms, and the NHS CRD EED search filter for economic evaluation [12] was applied in the Medline and EMBASE searches.
The search records were imported into the Covidence reviewing tool by Cochrane for screening. Two reviewers (JPM, JO) independently screened all titles and abstracts of the identified studies against the inclusion criteria, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The full texts of the remaining studies were subsequently assessed to determine their eligibility for inclusion. Citation searches of five key reviews [6,7,8, 13, 14], as well as the reference lists of the included studies, were scanned to identify studies that were missed following the database searches.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
A study was deemed eligible for inclusion if it was a model-based full health economic evaluation, i.e., a comparative analysis of alternative health interventions/policies in terms of both costs and consequences [15]. We considered population-level and individual lifestyle interventions or policies aimed at reducing the harmful consumption of alcohol, dietary salt, or both unhealthy dietary behaviours in any defined human population globally.
Conversely, studies were excluded based on the following criteria:
-
1.
Economic evaluations were based on empirical trials, i.e., within-trial or alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
-
2.
Evaluations of pharmacological interventions, medical devices or procedures, or diagnostic tests.
-
3.
Epidemiological models that evaluate only the burden of disease with no cost or health economic outcomes.
-
4.
Cost analysis studies that do not examine the consequences or health-related outcomes.
-
5.
Non-English language studies.
Data extraction and synthesis
A pair of reviewers extracted the relevant data from the included studies using a data extraction template, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. We grouped the included studies into eight categories of model structure by examining their methodological approach based on definitions in Briggs et al. [16]. For each study, we extracted the following data.
-
Study description: author, publication year, and country/setting.
-
Policy/intervention details: intervention/policy evaluated, and target population.
-
Model details: model name, model structure, and cost perspective.
-
Study outcomes: health outcomes, cost outcomes, and currency year.
For each study, there was a particular focus on the model methodology and structure. We synthesised the extracted model characteristics to not only provide an overview of the included models but also to describe the modelled underlying risk factor to disease pathway, the effect of interventions on the model pathway to disease, and the approaches used to calculate health and economic outcomes.
Results
Search results
The search yielded a total of 1,958 articles after duplicates were removed. Only 230 full-text articles potentially met the eligibility criteria after title and abstract screening. After full-text assessment of the 230 articles against the inclusion criteria, 148 additional articles were removed, leaving a total of 82 health economic modelling studies which were included in the review. Figure听1 presents a PRISMA flow chart describing the selection process. Table听1 presents a summary of the included health economic models and their study characteristics.
Study characteristics
The oldest published study included in the review was published in 1995 [47]. Out of the 82 included studies, only 9% were published between 1995 and 2008. There was an increase in the number of health economic modelling studies published in subsequent years, which has been sustained (Fig.听2). Policies were evaluated in a total of 64 countries globally (Fig.听3), and 66% of all included studies were conducted in high-income countries. Some of these studies conducted evaluations across multiple countries [99] or over specified epidemiological regions [46].
Policy interventions aimed at reducing dietary salt intake, alcohol consumption, or both were most frequently evaluated in the UK and Australia, with 23% and 18% of the studies focusing on these populations, respectively. Among all the included studies, countries in the European region were the most represented, while countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean and Southeast Asia were the least represented (Fig.听3). Health economic modelling studies in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) accounted for only 10% of the included studies.
Modelled population, interventions and risk factors
The modelled population in the included studies were mostly adults, generally ranging in age from 25 to 85 years. Several alcohol policy models specifically targeted at-risk groups, such as risky drinkers or individuals at high cardiovascular risk, within their evaluation [36, 41, 45]. Two alcohol modelling studies [24, 26] modelled HIV-infected persons and other at-risk populations, although there were no added considerations regarding the intervention effect on the target population. Only one study modelled a population of children aged 0鈥17 years, assessing the impact of dietary policies on their health over the course of their lives [58].
Most of the modelling studies evaluated at least one policy intervention to reduce salt intake or improve diet (58%), while 38% of the models were specifically developed to evaluate alcohol consumption policies. Only 4% of the included modelling studies evaluated both alcohol and salt-related policies.
The evaluated salt policies included sodium reformulations, sodium taxes, and nutrient labelling (Fig.听4). Sodium reformulation was the most common intervention evaluated (n鈥=鈥23). The effect of these salt-reduction interventions is usually linked to health outcomes through systolic blood pressure and other risk reductions. For example, Wilson et al. [72] determined the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke events based on the reduction in systolic blood pressure caused by the evaluated health intervention. Rubinstein et al. [92] also modelled the impact of health promotion campaigns through mass media on reducing salt consumption, focusing on both blood pressure and total cholesterol levels as intermediate risk factors for adverse health outcomes.
On the other hand, alcohol policies such as taxation and minimum unit pricing policies and primary care interventions were the most common interventions evaluated among the alcohol policy modelling studies (Fig.听4). Alcohol consumption frequency was the most common risk factor modelled in these studies, but there was no modelled disease risk pathway through systolic blood pressure from alcohol to health outcomes. The effect of alcohol consumption on the risk of CVD, stroke events, and other alcohol-attributable diseases and complications was modelled directly. These intervention effect sizes are normally derived from observational studies or meta-analyses and are implemented on the target population over a predetermined time horizon.
The review identified only three (4%) studies that modelled both salt and alcohol as independent risk factors for disease in their economic evaluation [96,97,98]. These studies individually constructed a health economic decision model to evaluate multiple interventions to combat NCDs, including salt-reduction and alcohol taxation policies. Policies that target both salt and alcohol consumption and other risk factors include taxation policies and health promotion interventions. Other risk factors for NCDs that were included in these models included smoking and cholesterol concentration.
Multiple risk factors were therefore incorporated in the health economic models included in this review, including total blood cholesterol levels, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes status, overweight/obese status, drinking history, hypertensive status, and history of other cardiovascular diseases. These risk factors were either assumed to be associated with salt or alcohol consumption or independent of them in relation to the modelled outcomes and diseases.
Model outcome measures and diseases
Of the 82 included studies, 59 (72%) assumed a healthcare system perspective in the costing approach used in their economic evaluation, while 23 (28%) evaluated from the societal perspective. The healthcare system perspective was defined as a costing perspective amalgamating the healthcare system, government, public sector, and financial cost perspectives. The majority of these studies included direct healthcare, intervention/programme implementation, and informal care costs in their economic analyses. The additional cost components considered from the societal perspective include other economic costs such as productivity gains or losses, health-related net monetary benefits, and avoided time loss. These costs were obtained from publications or estimated by local experts.
Reported health outcomes from economic evaluations include health-adjusted life-year metrics such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. Studies also reported epidemiological estimates such as deaths prevented or postponed, disease cases averted, incidence and morbidity (Table听1).
The studies differed in the range of complications and comorbidities considered as outcomes. The range of diseases modelled across the included studies covered the main diet-related cardiometabolic outcomes, cancers, and alcohol-attributable harm (Table听2). The most common diseases reported were cardiovascular diseases (79%), cerebrovascular complications (66%), and cancers (35%), as well as various complications and harms attributable to alcohol (44%) (Fig.听5).
Among the diseases included in both the salt and alcohol policy models, CHD was the most common modelled cardiovascular disease. The IMPACT CHD model evaluated salt-reduction policies in the UK and Syria populations [74, 76, 77]. The expected change in population salt intake from the interventions was translated into a change in mean blood pressure in the modelled populations. This policy effect was subsequently used to estimate the hypertension prevalence and coronary heart disease deaths prevented or postponed.
Hypertension was modelled explicitly as a health outcome in some of the included salt models; hence, the costs of medication and treatments were included [50, 61, 63, 64, 71]. Hypertension, or systolic blood pressure, was an intermediate risk factor for CVD in 40 (83%) of the salt modelling studies but not in the alcohol policy models. Aminde et al. [54] reported changes in blood pressure after a population reduction in salt intake to WHO targets using a proportional multistate lifetable model. The model then estimates the impact of blood pressure changes on stroke incidence and mortality. This cerebrovascular event was therefore modelled downstream as a complication of high blood pressure and was not directly associated with excessive salt intake.
Other non-hypertensive complications included as explicit health outcomes in the health economic models include diabetes, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and various cancers. Cancers which were modelled with salt as a risk factor included breast cancer (in women), gastric, kidney, liver, colorectal, kidney and bowel cancer. These cancers, as well as oesophageal, laryngeal, rectal and oropharyngeal cancer, were also attributable to alcohol consumption in some alcohol policy models. In addition, Brennan et al. [17] reported hospitalisations, crimes and alcohol-attributable deaths and inequalities that result from implementing an alcohol pricing policy, while Gibbs et al. [18] presented changes in alcohol consumption and expenditures when implementing such policies. These health economic outcomes were estimates of the burden of alcohol-related complications and injuries such as road traffic injuries, falls, fires, suffocation, and self-harm.
Modelling methodology and structures
The models varied widely, from individual-level and cohort state-transition models, to attributable fraction models using a comparative risk assessment method, though none of the studies explored any interaction between individuals. The studies utilised the following epidemiological modelling methods: comparative risk assessments (29%), multistate lifetables (27%), Markov cohort (22%), microsimulation (13%), decision trees (3%), system dynamics models (1%), and other unspecified models (5%) (Fig.听6). There were no agent-based or discrete event simulation modelling studies included in this review. Some of these studies were based on established models that have been applied in different populations to evaluate different policies, with minimal changes in the model structure.
PopMod is one of the first published multistate dynamic lifetable modelling tools that has facilitated disease modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis for priority setting in diverse settings [100]. Murray et al. [94] used this tool to simulate the evolution of a stable population for the cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to reduce cholesterol and systolic blood pressure in different areas of the world. The structure of this analysis was based on a system of ordinary differential equations that models the temporal evolution of a population subjected to two disease conditions.
Salomon et al. [98] also used the PopMod tool to estimate the cost-effectiveness of various interventions, including salt-reduction and alcohol interventions, to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases in Mexico. This finding demonstrated the transferability of the model, which not only models interacting disease conditions but also incorporates both alcohol use and salt intake via systolic blood pressure as risk factors for disease. This modelling tool is typically used in the WHO-CHOICE programme [101, 102]. Moreover, comparative risk assessment (CRA) models have been used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of salt and alcohol interventions for combating NCDs in diverse settings in Southeast Asia, Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa, and a range of low- or middle-income countries (LMICs), making the results more comparable [93, 96].
The Dutch National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM) Chronic Disease model was used to simulate the change in prevalence rates of diseases causally related to alcohol consumption caused by an intervention [41, 43]. The relative risks for diseases related to alcohol consumption were derived from a meta-analysis with estimates for different alcohol consumption categories. The Assessing Cost-Effectiveness (ACE) in Prevention model, developed in Australia, enables a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis of preventative intervention options [29, 33]. Over the years, both the ACE-prevention and RIVM models have undergone adaptations to incorporate updated inputs and accommodate changes to their structure [103].
The proportional multistate lifetable Markov model is a dynamic epidemiological model well suited for comparing multiple countries and providing valuable insights for the prioritisation of preventive interventions at the national, regional, and global levels [104]. It has been used to model preventive interventions with the aim of reducing both salt- and alcohol-attributable disease burden [42, 68, 88]. In this model, disease progression is estimated in Markov health states and linked to the multiple cohort lifetable.
This multistate lifetable approach was adopted in the UK for the PRIMEtime Cost-Effectiveness model, which estimates diet changes on morbidity and mortality via blood pressure, cholesterol and body weight [105]. This model facilitated the evaluation of the 2003 to 2018 population salt reduction program implemented in England, with the model projecting its impact by 2050 [53]. The downstream effect of salt intake on systolic blood pressure was modelled, which then estimated the risk of CVD burden and the healthcare and social care utilisation needed.
The IMPACT CHD model, developed in the UK, uses a population-attributable risk fraction approach to estimate the cost effectiveness of salt reduction policies for reducing coronary heart disease in England, Syria, and other Eastern Mediterranean countries [74, 76, 77]. This CRA methodology is commonly applied for alcohol models such as the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model [106], which also incorporates lifetables in its structure to estimate the effect of alcohol pricing policies such as the minimum unit pricing policy [28, 38]. This model applies the potential impact fraction framework to estimate the impact of changes in alcohol consumption on various alcohol-related harm.
Microsimulation models are becoming increasingly common in the health economics field since they address the limitation of cohort models in capturing the variation in individual characteristics [107]. The School for Public Health Research diabetes prevention model uses this methodology in the evaluation of dietary, lifestyle, and diabetes interventions [50, 51, 56]. The modelled effect of restricting advertising for foods high in fat, salt and sugar was on caloric intake and BMI, so the impact of salt intake on blood pressure was not considered [50]. However, the individual patient model structure allowed heterogeneity in the estimation of HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol and BMI as risk factors for disease.
The OECD鈥檚 Strategic Public Health Planning Model for Non-communicable Diseases also uses a microsimulation approach to estimate the economic impact of primary prevention policies, such as food menu labelling and alcohol taxes [97]. This microsimulation model addresses all major threats related to non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as injuries and mental health issues. Additionally, it considers modifiable risk factors such as harmful alcohol consumption, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and tobacco use. The country-level risk factor profiles and disease epidemiology data are input into an annual microsimulation to generate outputs on health outcomes, healthcare expenditures, and labour force expenditures.
Discussion
This study aimed to determine the scope of the published literature and review existing evidence on the modelling methods and structures used in health economic models evaluating salt- and/or alcohol-reduction public health policies. These findings indicate growing interest in using health economic models to evaluate the health and economic impacts of interventions targeting salt or alcohol consumption. The increase in studies since the 2010s is likely linked to the development of key health economic models, such as the ACE-prevention and Sheffield Alcohol Policy models, which have either been adapted or inspired similar models for evaluating health policies. The study also highlights the increasing role of health economic models in evidence-based policymaking, especially in high-income countries.
This review gains value from encompassing studies conducted across low-, middle-, and high-income countries. It highlights the lack of health economic modelling studies in LMICs, where the burden of non-communicable diseases, driven in part by alcohol and salt consumption, is increasing [1]. As a result, the use of health economic modelling tools and evidence to support health priority setting in these countries may be limited. Dotsch-Klerk et al. [8] suggested that the limited availability of data, such as epidemiological data and cost data, in lower income countries may explain the limited number of modelling studies from those countries. This is of concern because generating the cost-effectiveness evidence of primary prevention strategies, which is critical in settings with limited financial resources, could be crucial for reducing the burden of NCDs.
The World Health Organisation Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (WHO-CHOICE) programme has been instrumental in such cost-effectiveness analyses of health interventions globally [108]. The use of standardised methods across disease areas is a major added value of the CHOICE approach, as it allows for fair comparisons between and across health programmes. The WHO-CHOICE has developed a software tool, the OneHealth tool (), to help analysts and decision-makers conduct country-based and regional cost-effectiveness analyses of various health interventions for strategic planning and costing. This tool will enable the use of health economic modelling in LMICs to assess the cost-effectiveness of different health strategies for priority setting and resource allocation.
There is also potential for developing joint dietary salt and alcohol policy models that evaluate public health policies targeting both risk factors, exploring their association or integrated effects on health and economic outcomes. Such analyses would require input data (or assumptions) on the joint effects of salt and alcohol consumption, potentially derived from observational studies, clinical models or RCTs. These models could support policymaking aimed at reducing disease burden and assist in priority setting, particularly in resource-constrained settings. For example, health-related food taxes could be evaluated across different dietary behaviour targets, helping decision-makers compare cost-effectiveness across various policies.
The strength of this review lies in its potential to inform the development of public health economic models for evaluating alcohol and salt reduction strategies. By identifying and examining common modelling pathways and approaches, it provides a foundation for adapting these methods for future models. This review explores the effects of alcohol and dietary salt reduction interventions on health outcomes, both directly and through intermediate risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, summarising the various modelling pathways used. While a detailed review of the epidemiological studies estimating the effects of these intermediate risk factors on health outcomes would be valuable, it was beyond the scope of this review.
Previous systematic reviews of salt or alcohol models have provided an overview and critically appraised economic models that have served their purpose in informing policymakers about the availability of modelling techniques [6]. However, to our knowledge, no studies have compared the differing modelling structures of alcohol and salt models, or explored their risk factor pathways to disease. Furthermore, the systematic approach used for the literature search and data collection ensures rigour.
A limitation of this review is that it did not assess the quality of the identified economic evaluations, nor did it include a critical analysis of the models in regard to the appropriateness of modelling methods in health economic studies, as this was not the intended purpose of the review. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the health economic models and the methods used. Therefore, a systemic evaluation of the included studies and a risk of bias assessment were not needed. Another limitation is that only studies published in English were included, which means that methods used by other studies published in other languages might have been missed.
Nonetheless, the review findings can inform economic evaluation methods for analysing the cost-effectiveness of salt and alcohol public health policies. The evidence base generated from health economic models can underpin policymaking on alcohol and salt reduction in the population. Future research should prioritise the development of health economics models that incorporate multiple risk factors of disease and are broadly applicable for evaluating related interventions. Such models would enable cost-effectiveness analyses of policies targeting multiple risk factors, such as alcohol and salt, to support priority setting.
Conclusions
This scoping review identified modelling studies used to evaluate policies and lifestyle interventions to reduce salt and/or alcohol intake. It offers valuable insights into the diverse public health economic modelling approaches, highlighting their varying complexities and information requirements in estimating the health and economic impacts of these interventions. This review revealed that systolic blood pressure was a key intermediate risk factor in the excessive salt-to-disease modelling pathway for most studies. However, the effects of alcohol consumption on adverse health effects are usually modelled directly using estimates of the relative risk of disease. We identified only a few modelling studies that incorporate both alcohol and salt as risk factors. It is also clear from this review that incorporating multiple risk factors in health economic model evaluations, especially in LMICs where it鈥檚 limited, will generate the needed cost-effectiveness evidence for decision makers, to facilitate the implementation of policies to reduce both salt and alcohol consumption.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information file].
Abbreviations
- ACE:
-
Assessing Cost-Effectiveness
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- CHD:
-
Coronary heart disease
- CRA:
-
Comparative risk assessment
- CVD:
-
Cardiovascular disease
- DALY:
-
Disability-adjusted life year
- DES:
-
Discrete event simulation
- LMIC:
-
Low- or middle-income country
- NCD:
-
Non-communicable disease
- QALY:
-
Quality-adjusted life year
- RCT:
-
Randomised controlled trial
- RIVM:
-
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
- WHO:
-
World Health Organisation
References
Organization WH. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
Grillo A, Salvi L, Coruzzi P, Salvi P, Parati G. Sodium intake and hypertension. Nutrients. 2019;11(9):1970.
Miller PM, Anton RF, Egan BM, Basile J, Nguyen SA. Excessive alcohol consumption and hypertension: clinical implications of current research. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2005;7(6):346鈥51.
Everest G, Marshall L, Fraser C, Briggs A. Addressing the leading risk factors for ill health: a review of government policies tackling smoking, poor diet, physical inactivity and harmful alcohol use in England. The Health Foundation; 2022. .
Kato H, Ikeda N, Sugiyama T, Nomura M, Yoshita K, Nishi N. Use of simulation models in health economic evaluation studies of dietary salt-reduction policies for cardiovascular disease prevention. [Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi] Jpn J Public Health. 2021;68(9):631鈥43.
Emmert-Fees KMF, Karl FM, von Philipsborn P, Rehfuess EA, Laxy M. Simulation modeling for the economic evaluation of Population-based dietary policies: a systematic scoping review. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(5):1957鈥95.
Bardach AE, Alcaraz AO, Ciapponi A, Garay OU, Riviere AP, Palacios A, et al. Alcohol consumption鈥檚 attributable disease burden and cost-effectiveness of targeted public health interventions: a systematic review of mathematical models. 樱花视频. 2019;19(1):1378.
D枚tsch-Klerk M, Bruins MJ, Detzel P, et al. Modelling health and economic impact of nutrition interventions: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023;77(4):413-26. .
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O鈥橞rien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467鈥73.
Arksey HOML. Scoping studies: towards a Methodological Framework. Int J Social Res Methodol Theory Pract. 2005;8(1):19鈥32.
Brennan A, Chick SE, Davies R. A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies. Health Econ. 2006;15(12):1295鈥310.
EED NC. NHS CRD EED search filter for economic evaluations. Available from: .
Unal B, Capewell S, Critchley JA. Coronary heart disease policy models: a systematic review. 樱花视频. 2006;6:213.
Hoang VP, Shanahan M, Shukla N, Perez P, Farrell M, Ritter A. A systematic review of modelling approaches in economic evaluations of health interventions for drug and alcohol problems. 樱花视频 Health Serv Res. 2016;16:127.
Drummond MSM, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Briggs AD, Wolstenholme J, Blakely T, Scarborough P. Choosing an epidemiological model structure for the economic evaluation of non-communicable disease public health interventions. Popul Health Metr. 2016;14:17.
Brennan A, Angus C, Pryce R, Buykx P, Henney M, Gillespie D, et al. Effectiveness of subnational implementation of minimum unit price for alcohol: policy appraisal modelling for local authorities in England. Addiction. 2022;118(5):819鈥33.
Gibbs N, Angus C, Dixon S, Charles DH, Meier PS, Boachie MK, et al. Equity impact of minimum unit pricing of alcohol on household health and finances among rich and poor drinkers in South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(1):e007824.
Brennan A, Angus C, Pryce R, Buykx P, Henney M, Gillespie D et al. Potential effects of minimum unit pricing at local authority level on alcohol-attributed harms in North West and North East England: a modelling study. Public Health Research. Southampton (UK). 2021.
Robinson E, Nguyen P, Jiang H, Livingston M, Ananthapavan J, Lal A, et al. Increasing the price of alcohol as an obesity prevention measure: the potential cost-effectiveness of introducing a uniform volumetric tax and a minimum floor price on alcohol in Australia. Nutrients. 2020;12(3):603.
Jiang H, Room R, Livingston M, Callinan S, Brennan A, Doran C, et al. The effects of alcohol pricing policies on consumption, health, social and economic outcomes, and health inequality in Australia: a protocol of an epidemiological modelling study. BMJ open. 2019;9(6):e029918.
Cobiac LJ, Mizdrak A, Wilson N. Cost-effectiveness of raising alcohol excise taxes to reduce the injury burden of road traffic crashes. Injury Prevention: J Int Soc Child Adolesc Injury Prev. 2019;25(5):421鈥7.
Angus C, Thomas C, Anderson P, Meier PS, Brennan A. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of brief interventions for heavy drinking in primary health care across Europe. Eur J Pub Health. 2017;27(2):345鈥51.
Galarraga O, Gao B, Gakinya BN, Klein DA, Wamai RG, Sidle JE, et al. Task-shifting alcohol interventions for HIV鈥+鈥塸ersons in Kenya: a cost-benefit analysis. 樱花视频 Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):239.
Zur RM, Zaric GS. A microsimulation cost-utility analysis of alcohol screening and brief intervention to reduce heavy alcohol consumption in Canada. Addiction (Abingdon England). 2016;111(5):817鈥31.
Kessler J, Ruggles K, Patel A, Nucifora K, Li L, Roberts MS, et al. Targeting an alcohol intervention cost-effectively to persons living with HIV/AIDS in East Africa. Alcoholism Clin Exper Research. 2015;39(11):2179鈥88.
Angus C, Scafato E, Ghirini S, Torbica A, Ferre F, Struzzo P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a programme of screening and brief interventions for alcohol in primary care in Italy. 樱花视频 Fam Pract. 2014;15: 26.
Brennan A, Meng Y, Holmes J, Hill-McManus D, Meier PS. Potential benefits of minimum unit pricing for alcohol versus a ban on below cost selling in England 2014: modelling study. BMJ. 2014;349:g5452.
Holm AL, Veerman L, Cobiac L, Ekholm O, Diderichsen F. Cost-effectiveness of preventive interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in Denmark. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2): e88041.
Holm AL, Veerman L, Cobiac L, Ekholm O, Diderichsen F. Cost-effectiveness of changes in alcohol taxation in Denmark: a modelling study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014;12(1):1.
Ditsuwan V, Lennert Veerman J, Bertram M, Vos T. Cost-effectiveness of interventions for reducing road traffic injuries related to driving under the influence of alcohol. Value Health. 2013;16(1):23鈥30.
Purshouse RC, Brennan A, Rafia R, Latimer NR, Archer RJ, Angus CR, et al. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary care in England. Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire). 2013;48(2):180鈥8.
Doran CM, Byrnes JM, Cobiac LJ, Vandenberg B, Vos T. Estimated impacts of alternative Australian alcohol taxation structures on consumption, public health and government revenues. Med J Aust. 2013;199(9):619鈥22.
Popova S, Patra J, Sarnocinska-Hart A, Gnam WH, Giesbrecht N, Rehm J. Cost of privatisation versus government alcohol retailing systems: Canadian example. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012;31(1):4鈥12.
Magnus A, Cadilhac D, Sheppard L, Cumming T, Pearce D, Carter R. The economic gains of achieving reduced alcohol consumption targets for Australia. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1313鈥9.
Navarro HJ, Shakeshaft A, Doran CM, Petrie DJ. The potential cost-effectiveness of general practitioner delivered brief intervention for alcohol misuse: evidence from rural Australia. Addict Behav. 2011;36(12):1191鈥8.
Cadilhac DA, Magnus A, Sheppard L, Cumming TB, Pearce DC, Carter R. The societal benefits of reducing six behavioural risk factors: an economic modelling study from Australia. 樱花视频. 2011;11(100968562):483.
Purshouse RC, Meier PS, Brennan A, Taylor KB, Rafia R. Estimated effect of alcohol pricing policies on health and health economic outcomes in England: an epidemiological model. Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1355鈥64.
Barbosa C, Taylor B, Godfrey C, Rehm J, Parrott S, Drummond C. Modelling lifetime QALYs and health care costs from different drinking patterns over time: a Markov model. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010;19(2):97鈥109.
Byrnes JM, Cobiac LJ, Doran CM, Vos T, Shakeshaft AP. Cost-effectiveness of volumetric alcohol taxation in Australia. Med J Australia. 2010;192(8):439鈥43.
Tariq L, van den Berg M, Hoogenveen RT, van Baal PH. Cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic screening programme and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use in primary care. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(5):e5696.
Cobiac L, Vos T, Doran C, Wallace A. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent alcohol-related disease and injury in Australia. Addiction (Abingdon England). 2009;104(10):1646鈥55.
van den Berg M, van Baal PH, Tariq L, Schuit AJ, de Wit GA, Hoogenveen RT. The cost-effectiveness of increasing alcohol taxes: a modelling study. 樱花视频 Med. 2008;6(101190723):36.
Lai T, Habicht J, Reinap M, Chisholm D, Baltussen R. Costs, health effects and cost-effectiveness of alcohol and tobacco control strategies in Estonia. Health Policy. 2007;84(1):75鈥88.
Mortimer D, Segal L. Economic evaluation of interventions for problem drinking and alcohol dependence: cost per QALY estimates. Alcohol Alcohol (Oxf Oxfs). 2005;40(6):549鈥55.
Chisholm D, Rehm J, Van Ommeren M, Monteiro M. Reducing the global burden of hazardous alcohol use: a comparative cost-effectiveness analysis. J Stud Alcohol. 2004;65(6):782鈥93.
Downs SM, Klein JD. Clinical preventive services efficacy and adolescents鈥 risky behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(4):374鈥9.
Aminde LN, Wanjau MN, Cobiac LJ, Veerman JL. Estimated impact of achieving the Australian National Sodium reduction targets on blood pressure, chronic kidney disease burden and healthcare costs: a modelling study. Nutrients. 2023;15(2):318.
Ikeda N, Yamashita H, Hattori J, Kato H, Yoshita K, Nishi N. Reduction of cardiovascular events and related healthcare expenditures through achieving population-level targets of dietary salt intake in Japan: a simulation model based on the National Health and Nutrition Survey. Nutrients. 2022;14(17):3606.
Thomas C, Breeze P, Cummins S, Cornelsen L, Yau A, Brennan A. The health, cost and equity impacts of restrictions on the advertisement of high fat, salt and sugar products across the transport for London network: a health economic modelling study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19(1):93.
Bates SE, Thomas C, Islam N, Ahern AL, Breeze P, Griffin S, et al. Using health economic modelling to inform the design and development of an intervention: estimating the justifiable cost of weight loss maintenance in the UK. 樱花视频. 2022;22(1):290.
Nilson EAF, Pearson-Stuttard J, Collins B, Guzman-Castillo M, Capewell S, O鈥橣laherty M, et al. Estimating the health and economic effects of the voluntary sodium reduction targets in Brazil: microsimulation analysis. 樱花视频 Med. 2021;19(1):225.
Alonso S, Tan M, Wang C, Kent S, Cobiac L, MacGregor GA, et al. Impact of the 2003 to 2018 Population Salt Intake Reduction Program in England: a modeling study. Hypertension. 2021;77(4):1086鈥94.
Aminde LN, Phung HN, Phung D, Cobiac LJ, Veerman JL. Dietary salt reduction, prevalence of hypertension and avoidable Burden of Stroke in Vietnam: modelling the Health and Economic impacts. Front Public Health. 2021;9: 682975.
Nilson EAF, Metlzer AB, Labont茅 ME, Jaime PC. Modelling the effect of compliance with WHO salt recommendations on cardiovascular disease mortality and costs in Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7): e0235514.
Breeze P, Thomas C, Thokala P, Lafortune L, Brayne C, Brennan A. The impact of including costs and outcomes of dementia in a health economic model to evaluate lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Med Decis Mak. 2020;40(7):912鈥23.
Aminde LN, Cobiac L, Veerman JL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of population salt reduction interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in Cameroon: mathematical modelling study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11): e041346.
Mytton OT, Boyland E, Adams J, Collins B, O鈥機onnell M, Russell SJ, et al. The potential health impact of restricting less-healthy food and beverage advertising on UK television between 05.30 and 21.00 hours: a modelling study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(10):e1003212.
Blakely T, Cleghorn C, Mizdrak A, Waterlander W, Nghiem N, Swinburn B, et al. The effect of food taxes and subsidies on population health and health costs: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(7):e404-13.
Laverty AA, Kypridemos C, Seferidi P, Vamos EP, Pearson-Stuttard J, Collins B, et al. Quantifying the impact of the Public Health Responsibility Deal on salt intake, cardiovascular disease and gastric cancer burdens: interrupted time series and microsimulation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(9):881鈥7.
Collins B, Kypridemos C, Pearson-Stuttard J, Huang Y, Bandosz P, Wilde P, et al. FDA Sodium reduction targets and the Food Industry: are there incentives to Reformulate? Microsimulation cost-effectiveness analysis. Milbank Q. 2019;97(3):858鈥80.
Briggs ADM, Wolstenholme J, Scarborough P. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of salt reformulation and increasing access to leisure centres in England, with PRIMEtime CE model validation using the AdViSHE tool. 樱花视频 Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):489.
Kypridemos C, Collins B, McHale P, Bromley H, Parvulescu P, Capewell S, et al. Future cost-effectiveness and equity of the NHS Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme: Microsimulation modelling using data from Liverpool, UK. PLoS Med. 2018;15(5): e1002573.
Basu S, Yudkin JS, Berkowitz SA, Jawad M, Millett C. Reducing chronic disease through changes in food aid: a microsimulation of nutrition and cardiometabolic disease among Palestinian refugees in the Middle East. PLoS Med. 2018;15(11):e1002700.
Pearson-Stuttard J, Kypridemos C, Collins B, Mozaffarian D, Huang Y, Bandosz P, et al. Estimating the health and economic effects of the proposed US Food and Drug Administration voluntary sodium reformulation: Microsimulation cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med. 2018;15(4): e1002551.
Brown V, Ananthapavan J, Veerman L, Sacks G, Lal A, Peeters A, et al. The potential cost-effectiveness and equity impacts of restricting television advertising of unhealthy food and beverages to Australian children. Nutrients. 2018;10(5):622.
Li X, Jan S, Yan LL, Hayes A, Chu Y, Wang H, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of a school-based education program to reduce salt intake in children and their families in China. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9): e0183033.
Cobiac LJ, Tam K, Veerman L, Blakely T. Taxes and Subsidies for Improving Diet and Population Health in Australia: a cost-effectiveness modelling study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(2):e1002232.
Webb M, Fahimi S, Singh GM, Khatibzadeh S, Micha R, Powles J, et al. Cost effectiveness of a government supported policy strategy to decrease sodium intake: global analysis across 183 nations. BMJ (Clinical Res ed). 2017;356:8900488 bmj, 101090866):i6699.
Wang M, Moran AE, Liu J, Coxson PG, Penko J, Goldman L, et al. Projected impact of Salt Restriction on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in China: a modeling study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0146820.
Watkins DA, Olson ZD, Verguet S, Nugent RA, Jamison DT. Cardiovascular disease and impoverishment averted due to a salt reduction policy in South Africa: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Policy Plann. 2016;31(1):75鈥82.
Wilson N, Nghiem N, Eyles H, Mhurchu CN, Shields E, Cobiac LJ, et al. Modeling health gains and cost savings for ten dietary salt reduction targets. Nutr J. 2016;15:44.
Nghiem N, Blakely T, Cobiac LJ, Cleghorn CL, Wilson N. The health gains and cost savings of dietary salt reduction interventions, with equity and age distributional aspects. 樱花视频. 2016;16:423.
Wilcox ML, Mason H, Fouad FM, Rastam S, al Ali R, Page TF, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of salt reduction policies to reduce coronary heart disease in Syria, 2010鈥2020. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(Suppl 1):S23-30.
Nghiem N, Blakely T, Cobiac LJ, Pearson AL, Wilson N. Health and economic impacts of eight different dietary salt reduction interventions. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4): e0123915.
Mason H, Shoaibi A, Ghandour R, O鈥橣laherty M, Capewell S, Khatib R, et al. A cost effectiveness analysis of salt reduction policies to reduce coronary heart disease in four Eastern Mediterranean countries. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e84445.
Collins M, Mason H, O鈥橣laherty M, Guzman-Castillo M, Critchley J, Capewell S. An economic evaluation of salt reduction policies to reduce coronary heart disease in England: a policy modeling study. Value Health. 2014;17(5):517鈥24.
Ortegon M, Lim S, Chisholm D, Mendis S. Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and tobacco use in sub-saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2012;344: e607.
Ferrante D, Konfino J, Mejia R, Coxson P, Moran A, Goldman L, et al. The cost-utility ratio of reducing salt intake and its impact on the incidence of cardiovascular disease in Argentina. Rev Panam Salud Publ鈥=鈥塒an Am J Public Health. 2012;32(4):274鈥80.
Cobiac LJ, Magnus A, Lim S, Barendregt JJ, Carter R, Vos T. Which interventions offer best value for money in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease? PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7): e41842.
Dodhia H, Phillips K, Zannou MI, Airoldi M, Bevan G. Modelling the impact on avoidable cardiovascular disease burden and costs of interventions to lower SBP in the England population. J Hypertens. 2012;30(1):217鈥26.
Barton P, Andronis L, Briggs A, McPherson K, Capewell S. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: modelling study. BMJ (Clinical Res ed). 2011;343(8900488, bmj, 101090866):d4044.
Ha DA, Chisholm D. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in Vietnam. Health Policy Plann. 2011;26(3):210鈥22.
Martikainen JA, Soini EJ, Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L. Health economic consequences of reducing salt intake and replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat in the adult Finnish population: estimates based on the FINRISK and FINDIET studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65(10):1148鈥55.
Rubinstein A, Colantonio L, Bardach A, Caporale J, Marti SG, Kopitowski K, et al. Estimation of the burden of cardiovascular disease attributable to modifiable risk factors and cost-effectiveness analysis of preventative interventions to reduce this burden in Argentina. 樱花视频. 2010;10: 627.
Smith-Spangler CM, Juusola JL, Enns EA, Owens DK, Garber AM. Population strategies to decrease sodium intake and the burden of cardiovascular disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(8):481鈥7 w170-3.
Bibbins-Domingo K, Chertow GM, Coxson PG, Moran A, Lightwood JM, Pletcher MJ, et al. Projected effect of dietary salt reductions on future cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(7):590鈥9.
Cobiac LJ, Vos T, Veerman JL. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce dietary salt intake. Heart. 2010;96(23):1920鈥5.
Palar K, Sturm R. Potential societal savings from reduced sodium consumption in the U.S. adult population. Am J Health Promotion. 2009;24(1):49鈥57.
Dall TM, Fulgoni VL 3, Zhang Y, Reimers KJ, Packard PT, Astwood JD. Potential health benefits and medical cost savings from calorie, sodium, and saturated fat reductions in the American diet. Am J Health Promot. 2009;23(6):412鈥22.
Akkazieva BCD, Akunov N, Jakob M. The health effects and costs of the interventions to control cardiovascular diseases in Kyrgyzstan. 2009; policy research paper no. 60(Bishkek: Health Policy Analysis Center).
Rubinstein A, Garcia Marti S, Souto A, Ferrante D, Augustovski F. Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis of a package of interventions to reduce cardiovascular disease in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2009;7((Rubinstein, Garcia Marti, Souto, Ferrante, Augustovski) IECS, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina(Rubinstein, Augustovski) Division of Family and Community Medicine, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Ai):10.
Asaria P, Chisholm D, Mathers C, Ezzati M, Beaglehole R. Chronic disease prevention: health effects and financial costs of strategies to reduce salt intake and control tobacco use. Lancet (London England). 2007;370(9604):2044鈥53.
Murray CJL, Lauer JA, Hutubessy RCW, Niessen L, Tomijima N, Rodgers A, et al. Effectiveness and costs of interventions to lower systolic blood pressure and cholesterol: a global and regional analysis on reduction of cardiovascular-disease risk. Lancet (London England). 2003;361(9359):717鈥25.
Selmer RM, Kristiansen IS, Haglerod A, Graff-Iversen S, Larsen HK, Meyer HE, et al. Cost and health consequences of reducing the population intake of salt. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(9):697鈥702.
Bertram MY, Chisholm D, Watts R, Waqanivalu T, Prasad V, Varghese C. Cost-effectiveness of Population Level and Individual Level interventions to combat non-communicable disease in Eastern Sub-saharan Africa and South East Asia: a WHO-CHOICE analysis. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2021;10(11):724鈥33.
Cheatley J, Aldea A, Lerouge A, Devaux M, Vuik S, Cecchini M. Tackling the cancer burden: the economic impact of primary prevention policies. Mol Oncol. 2021;15(3):779鈥89.
Salomon JA, Carvalho N, Gutierrez-Delgado C, Orozco R, Mancuso A, Hogan DR, et al. Intervention strategies to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases in Mexico: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2012;344(8900488, bmj, 101090866): e355.
Kontis V, Mathers CD, Rehm J, Stevens GA, Shield KD, Bonita R, et al. Contribution of six risk factors to achieving the 25鈥壝椻25 non-communicable disease mortality reduction target: a modelling study. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):427鈥37.
Lauer JA, Rohrich K, Wirth H, Charette C, Gribble S, Murray CJ. PopMod: a longitudinal population model with two interacting disease states. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003;1(1):6.
Hutubessy R, Chisholm D, Edejer TT. Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis for national-level priority-setting in the health sector. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003;1(1):8.
Tan-Torres Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, et al. Making Choices in Health鈥: WHO Guide to Cost Effectiveness Analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. p. 2003.
Watson P, Preston L, Squires H, Chilcott J, Brennan A. Modelling the economics of type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention: a literature review of methods. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(3):239鈥53.
Blakely T, Moss R, Collins J, Mizdrak A, Singh A, Carvalho N, et al. Proportional multistate lifetable modelling of preventive interventions: concepts, code and worked examples. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(5):1624鈥36.
Briggs ADM, Cobiac LJ, Wolstenholme J, Scarborough P, PRIMEtime CE. A multistate life table model for estimating the cost-effectiveness of interventions affecting diet and physical activity. 樱花视频 Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):485.
Brennan A, Meier P, Purshouse R, Rafia R, Meng Y, Hill-Macmanus D, et al. The Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model - A Mathematical description. Health Econ. 2015;24(10):1368鈥88.
Krijkamp EM, Alarid-Escudero F, Enns EA, Jalal HJ, Hunink MGM, Pechlivanoglou P. Microsimulation Modeling for Health Decision Sciences using R: a Tutorial. Med Decis Mak. 2018;38(3):400鈥22.
Bertram MY, Lauer JA, Stenberg K, Edejer TTT. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Interventions for Priority Setting in the Health System: an Update from WHO CHOICE. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(11):673鈥7.
Mensah J, Thomas C, Akparibo R, Brennan A. SA18 public health economic modelling in evaluations of salt and alcohol policies: a scoping review. Value Health. 2023;26(12):S544.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Louise Falzon for refining the search strategy and James Oguta (JO) for contributing to the selection of papers against the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Funding
This scoping review was funded by the University of Sheffield and the Wellcome Trust as part of a PhD studentship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JPM developed the scoping review protocol, searched the electronic databases, selected the papers by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, summarised the findings and interpreted the results, and drafted and had primary responsibility for the final content of the paper. AB, CT, and RA contributed to the design of the study, revised the review protocol, and contributed to the paper. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
A prior abstract from this review was previously published in Value in Health [109] as part of the ISPOR Europe 2023 conference held in Copenhagen, Denmark, from 12th November to 15th November 2023. This conference abstract can be found here: . The current scoping review has since been updated.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher鈥檚 note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit .
About this article
Cite this article
Mensah, J.P., Thomas, C., Akparibo, R. et al. Public health economic modelling in evaluations of salt and/or alcohol policies: a systematic scoping review. 樱花视频 25, 82 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21237-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21237-7