Ó£»¨ÊÓƵ

Skip to main content

Table 1 Frequency and prevalence (n (%)) of disadvantage indicators (ever vs. never experienced during follow-up) and education by experience of OHC and gender

From: Adulthood trajectories of resilience and vulnerability: exploring gender differences in disadvantage after experience of out-of-home care

Ìý

No OHC experience

OHC experience

Men

Women

p-value

Men

Women

p-value

n

%

n

%

N

%

n

%

Unemployment

1,487

23.0

1,328

21.1

0.012

147

30.4

119

26.7

0.22

Social welfare receipt

667

10.3

638

10.1

0.77

108

22.3

103

23.1

0.76

Disability pension

864

13.3

1,247

19.8

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

128

26.4

129

29.0

0.39

Affective disorders & Self-harm

431

6.7

563

9.0

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

57

11.8

70

15.7

0.08

Substance use & Crime

928

14.3

383

6.1

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

114

23.6

56

12.6

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Somatic morbidity

3,343

51.6

3,361

53.5

0.039

256

52.9

252

56.6

0.25

Education

5,032

78.6

5,304

85.2

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

317

66.3

321

73.1

0.025

Total

6,475

Ìý

6,288

ÌýÌý

484

Ìý

445

ÌýÌý
  1. * total n = 13,692; p-values derived from Pearson’s chi-squared tests for within OHC group comparisons between male and female for each indicator; education: highest educational level upper secondary or higher