Association of sedentary behaviour with gout and the interaction effect of hyperuricemia: a cross-sectional study from 2007 to 2018

Table 5 Threshold effect analysis of sedentary behaviour on gout using the linear regression model

Sedentary behaviour	听	Fully adjusted
Model 1^a	OR (95% CI), p-value	1.02 (1.00, 1.05) 0.0840
Model 2^b	Breakpoint	11
听	OR1 (Sedentary behaviour听<鈥�11 h/day)	0.99 (0.96, 1.03) 0.7049
听	OR2 (Sedentary behaviour听鈮モ€�11 h/day)	1.17 (1.07, 1.29) 0.0010
听	Logarithmic likelihood ratio test P value	0.005
Adults with hyperuricemia	听	听
Model 1	OR (95% CI), p-value	1.00 (0.96, 1.05) 0.8617
Model 2	Breakpoint	12
听	OR1 (Sedentary behaviour鈥�<鈥�11听h/day)	0.97 (0.92, 1.02) 0.1831
听	OR2 (Sedentary behaviour鈥夆墺鈥�11听h/day)	1.33 (1.12, 1.58) 0.0013
听	Logarithmic likelihood ratio test P value	0.002
Adults without hyperuricemia	听	听
Model 1	OR (95% CI), p-value	1.04 (1.01, 1.08) 0.0171
Model 2	Breakpoint	9
听	OR1 (Sedentary behaviour鈥�<鈥�9听h/day)	1.01 (0.95, 1.07) 0.7473
听	OR2 (Sedentary behaviour鈥夆墺鈥�9听h/day)	1.11 (1.02, 1.21) 0.0165
听	Logarithmic likelihood ratio test P value	0.130

OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval
^aModel 1: Standard linear model
^bModel 2: Two-piecewise linear model
^cAdjusted for gender, age, race, education level, ratio of family income to poverty, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, drinking status, smoking status, triglyceride, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, cotinine, BMI, serum uric acid, moderate physical activity and vigorous physical activity

ISSN: 1471-2458