Ó£»¨ÊÓƵ

Skip to main content

Table 2 Standardised relationships between study variables

From: Understanding the mechanisms underlying the socioeconomic disparities in cancer screening among Australian women

Ìý

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Individual SES (1)

−â¶Ä‰0.102**

0.209***

−â¶Ä‰0.169***

−â¶Ä‰0.190***

−â¶Ä‰0.143**

−â¶Ä‰0.114*

−â¶Ä‰0.191***

Area SES (2)

-

−â¶Ä‰0.022

0.040

−â¶Ä‰0.024

0.052

0.068

0.117*

PSS (3)

Ìý

-

−â¶Ä‰0.022

−â¶Ä‰0.778***

−â¶Ä‰0.128*

−â¶Ä‰0.144*

−â¶Ä‰0.163**

Screening Literacy (4)

ÌýÌý

-

0.008

0.035

0.161**

0.140**

GSE (5)

ÌýÌýÌý

-

0.001

0.005

0.062

Bowel Screening (6)

ÌýÌýÌýÌý

-

0.428***

0.288***

Breast Screening (7)

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

-

0.356***

Cervical Screening (8)

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

-

  1. Note. Correlations with the PSS and/or GSE variables were calculated using their respective latent factors. GSE = General Self-efficacy, PSS = Perceived Stress Scale, SES = Socioeconomic status. For individual level SES, higher scores indicate lower SES. For area level SES, lower scores indicate lower SES