Ó£»¨ÊÓƵ

Skip to main content

Table 3 Weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis of the relationship between the composite dietary antioxidant index and erectile dysfunction after propensity score matching (PSM)

From: Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional study from NHANES

Ìý

ED(n = 904)

Model 1

Ìý

Model 2

Ìý

Model 3

Ìý

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

Continuous

904

0.93(0.90,0.97)

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

0.93(0.90,0.97)

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

0.95(0.90,0.98)

0.003

Quartiles of CDAI

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Q1

274

Reference

Ìý

Reference

Ìý

Reference

Ìý

Q2

267

1.06(0.77,1.45)

0.738

1.04(0.76,1.44)

0.792

1.03(0.71,1.46)

0.900

Q3

210

0.71(0.51,0.98)

0.037

0.70(0.51,0.98)

0.035

0.71(0.48,1.11)

0.065

Q4

153

0.61(0.43,0.85)

0.004

0.60(0.43,0.85)

0.004

0.66(0.45,0.97)

0.031

P for trend

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý

&±ô³Ù; 0.001

Ìý
  1. Abbreviations CDAI: Composite dietary antioxidant index. Model 1: No covariates were adjusted. Model 2: Age and race were adjusted. Model 3: Based on Model 2, educational level, marital status, socioeconomic status, smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, physical activity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular disease, prostate disease, health status, dietary supplements covariates are added