Ó£»¨ÊÓƵ

Skip to main content

Table 3 Main findings of included studies

From: Mental health interventions affecting university faculty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study number

First author and date of publication

Sample size pre-intervention

Sample size post-intervention

Mental health instrument used

Mean mental health score pre-intervention

Mean mental health score post-intervention

SMD

Study findings on the effect of intervention on mental health of faculty

1

Brewer et al., 2019 [52]

38

17

K-10

18.58

16.06

-0.35

Distress levels pre-intervention scored an average of 18.5 ± 7.21 on the K-10 scale, while the post-intervention levels scored an average of 16.05 ± 5.11, indicating that the program was positively received by participants.

2

Garcia et al., 2023 [53]

18

17

HADS

10.41

8.06

-0.49

The levels of anxiety in participants decreased post-intervention compared to baseline, CI [0.48, 4.22].

3

Guerra et al., 2022 [52]

18

17

MCS

45.9

52.8

0.21

The mental score levels significantly improved from pre– (49.5 ± 44.45) to post-intervention (52.8 ± 50.05; p = 0.002).

4

Ikiugu et al., 2022 [55]

3

3

RAND SF-36 Energy

57.86

65.71

0.63

A statistically significant effect on well-being was observed between pre-intervention measurement (57.86 ± 12.51) and post-intervention measurement (65.71 ± 15.54; p = 0.03).

5

Lim et al., 2023 [56]

197

167

DASS-21

4.55

4.17

-0.11

A significant decrease was observed in depression (P = 0.02) and anxiety (P = 0.002) scores compared before and after the intervention.

6

Ogbuanya et al., 2017 [57]

55

55

EWIOSS

44.18

15.16

-5.41

A significant reduction of stress was observed between pre-intervention levels (44.18 ± 5.36) and post-intervention levels (15.66 ± 5.07; p = 0.00).

7

Rodrigues-Jimenes et al., 2022 [58]

11

11

PSS

17.88

12.13

-0.88

A significant reduction of stress was observed between pre-intervention levels (17.88 ± 6.56) and post-intervention levels (12.13 ± 6.96; p = 0.012).

8

Sood et al., 2014 [59]

13

11

PSS

25

19.6

-0.73

 A significant reduction of stress was observed between pre-intervention levels (25.0 ± 7.4) and post-intervention levels (19.6 ± 5.6; p = 0.020).

9

Stefansdottir and Sutherland, 2005 [60]

27

27

OSI

2.988

2.856

-0.16

The mean level of perceived stress decreased from 2.998 ± 0.826 to 2.856 ± 0.737 after the intervention, which was not statistically significant change (p = 0.244). Upon subgroup analysis, extravert-thinking faculty and those suffering high pre-intervention stress reported decreased stress levels post-intervention.

10

Ugwoke et al., 2017 [61]

93

93

TSQ

58.67

32.15

-2.95

Significant decrease in stress levels (p < 0.001) from pre-intervention at 59.67 ± 9.00 to post-intervention at 32.15 ± 3.17 was observed.

  1. SMD: Standardized Mean Difference. K-10: Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. MCS: Mental Composite Score. RAND SF-36 Energy: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey developed by RAND Corporation, USA. DASS-21: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 items. EWIOSS: Electronic Workshop Instructors’ Occupational Stress Scale. PSS: Perceived Stress Scale. OSI: Occupational Stress Indicator. TSQ: Teachers’ Stress Questionnaire