ӣƵ

Skip to main content
  • Research
  • Published:

Effect of mothers‘ health literacy on early childhood allergy prevention behaviours: results from the KUNO-Kids health study

Abstract

Background

Parents can engage in several behaviours with regard to early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP). These can be related to diet of mother/child and the modification of the home environment; not all of them are justified by current evidence. Previous studies showed that parental health literacy (HL) is related to favourable health behaviours directed at the child. This study aimed to investigate the causal effect of mothers’ HL on ECAP behaviours and to test different moderators of this effect.

Methods

One thousand six hundred sixty-two mothers participating in the KUNO-Kids health study in the area of Regensburg, Germany were surveyed on HL (assessed via the health care scale of the Health Literacy Survey-EU questionnaire, HLS-EU-Q47) and ECAP behaviours implemented during pregnancy and the child’s first year of life. Patterns in ECAP behaviours were identified by latent class analysis. Multinomial regression modelling was performed with HL as exposure, ECAP as outcome variable, allergy risk, parental competence and bonding, anxiety and depression as moderators as well as potentially confounding variables.

Results

We identified three classes of ECAP behaviours (class 1: „breastfeeding “ N = 871; class 2: „allergen-avoidance “ N = 490; class 3: „mixed behaviours “ N = 301). In univariable as well as fully adjusted regression models, compared to class 1, class 2 was negatively, and class 3 was not associated with HL. None of the tested moderating variables altered the association between HL and ECAP significantly.

Conclusions

We found aneffect of mothers’ HL on ECAP behaviours: lower HL of mothers increased allergen-avoiding behaviour directed at their child, while decreasing the chance of exclusive breastfeeding. Improving HL could contribute to the implementation of recommended ECAP behaviours in families, especially to the reduction of allergen-avoiding behaviours.

Peer Review reports

Background

Health literacy (HL) describes the knowledge, motivation and competencies of accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health-related information in healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion [1]. Recent studies showed associations of high parental HL and various positive health behaviours directed at the child and favourable child health outcomes [2,3,4]. However, most studies assumed direct associations between HL and health behaviours and tested simple models or models that included confounding variables like sociodemographic, psychosocial or cultural factors [4]. Only few studies considered more complex relationships between HL and health behaviours and tested more elaborated models including additional variables like mediators or moderators [5,6,7,8]. However, unlike mediators such as self-efficacy or attitudes and beliefs, only few studies included potential moderators in their analyses like education or residency. These moderators have not been proven to significantly moderate the effect of HL on health behaviours [6, 9, 10]. Overall, the current understanding of how and when HL translates into health behaviours is still limited, partly due to insufficient modelling strategies.

Early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP) is an umbrella term for parental behaviours with regard to children’s exposure to or avoidance of allergens in the field of nutrition or living environment. Despite earlier recommendations to avoid potential allergens, the prevalence of allergies remained high in the 2000s, so that more and more studies investigated the effect of early introduction of solid foods on the development of allergies. Based on an initial descriptive study of the prevalence of peanut allergy in the UK and Israel [11], the LEAP study started in 2006 with a randomized controlled trial. They found that early introduction of peanuts significantly decreased the incidence of peanut allergy among high-risk children [12]. Subsequently, a paradigm shift in allergy prevention from avoidance to exposure has occurred and has questioned many measures formerly presumed efficacious. Changes in guidelines on allergy prevention followed;in Germany, revised guidelines were published in 2014 and 2022 [13, 14]. Contrary to previous recommendations, recent research suggests that early exposure to potential allergens (such as peanuts, eggs, and milk) to infants may be beneficial [15]. Concerning allergen avoidance in the home environment (e.g., minimizing exposure to house dust mites) the effectiveness varies and recent guidelines even discourage measures for reducing house dust mites [13, 16, 17]. However, regardless of justification by current evidence, parents implement several behaviours with the aim of primary prevention of different allergic diseases, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, food allergy and atopic eczema. In a previous study we investigated whether and to what extent families in Germany engage in ECAP behaviours. We found that most parents practice behaviours like early introduction of solid foods, exclusively breastfeeding for at least four months or not exposing the child towards smoke, but allergen-avoidance measures (like avoidance of specific foods or measures against house dust mites) were also implemented – in both children at-risk and not at-risk for allergies [18].

While the effect of parental HL on specific behaviours which are part of allergy prevention has been studied (such as breastfeeding [19] or smoke exposure [20, 21]), until now, to the best of our knowledge a comprehensive set of different behaviours in the field of nutrition and living environment has not yet been addressed by research. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the causal effect of HL on ECAP behaviours in a large cohort of new mothers in Germany. For this purpose the following research questions were pursued:

  • Which patterns of ECAP behaviours are practiced in German families?

  • Is there an effect of mothers’ HL on ECAP behaviours?

  • Is the effect of HL on ECAP behaviours moderated by third variables?

Methods

Design

This observational study used data from the KUNO-Kids health study, a prospective birth cohort study which is conducted in the hospital St. Hedwig in Regensburg (East Bavaria, Germany) [22]. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (reference numbers: 14–101-0347, 19–1646-101).

Participants and data collection

Women were approached in the last trimester of pregnancy or during their hospital stay after delivery and were invited to participate in the study. Mothers were eligible for enrolment if they were at least 18years old and if they were able to provide informed consent. Newborns (and their families) were eligible for participation in the KUNO-Kids health study if no older sibling had already been included. Data considered in this manuscript was collected at four time points: directly after birth (baseline), after four weeks, after six months and after one year. At baseline, data was collected using a standardized computer-assisted personal interview and paper-based self-report questionnaires. For follow-up measurements, paper-based self-report questionnaires were sent to the families. Recruitment of the KUNO-Kids study started in June 2015. In the analysis sample we included participants who were recruited until March 2020 and who participated for at least one year in the study (with the last assessment in March 2021).

Measures

Outcome: ECAP

ECAP behaviours were assessed at all four time points in order to assess them as closely over time as possible. They comprised behaviours related to the diet of mother and child and the home environment. We applied latent class analysis (LCA) to identify different classes of ECAP behaviours. Variables were included in LCA if they had a minimum frequency of 10% for each response category and if they were not conditioned on another variable: fish as part of mothers’ diet during pregnancy (≥ 1 per week/ < 1 per week); duration of exclusively breastfeeding (no breastfeeding/ < 4months/ ≥ 4months); regular feeding of hydrolysed infant formula (hydrolysed formula/other formula); child’s age of introduction of any solid foods (< 4months/4–6months/ > 6months); allergy prevention related avoidance of feeding specific foods in the child’s diet during the first year of life (dairies, wheat, hen egg, fish, meat, nuts (incl. peanuts), soy, citruses, other fruit or vegetable, other foods): yes (any)/no; fish as part of solid foods during the child’s first year of life (≥ 1 per week/ < 1 per week); feeding of farm milk (yes (cow milk not boiled/boiled/goat milk)/no); measures for reducing house dust mites (removal of carpets, additional cleaning, use of specific vacuum cleaners, mattress encasing, allergy mattress, allergy pillow/blanket): yes (any)/no; and exposure to tobacco smoke by smoking of parents or in the child’s home: yes/no. Contact to hay, smoking during pregnancy and avoidance of pets were not considered in LCA since prevalence was too low (< 10%).

Exposure variable: HL

Mothers’ HL was assessed at baseline with the German version of the health care scale of the standardized HLS-EU-Q47 questionnaire [23] (internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91 [24]). It consists of 16 items that are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (“very difficult – quite difficult – quite easy – very easy”). For each person a mean score was calculated and transformed to a metric from 0 to 50 to be able to compare our results with other studies using the HLS-EU questionnaire [25]. In case of item-level missing values multiple imputation by chained equations methods were applied.

Confounding and moderating variables

Variables possibly acting as moderators of the HL-ECAP effect and a set of confounders were identified based on empirical findings summarized in a recent review of the literature [4]. Then, availability of variables in the KUNO-Kids study was checked and the resulting analytical models were specified based on directed acyclic graphs methodology (DAG, [26], see Fig.1). In order to avoid multicollinearity only the most prominent variables of relevant topics (e.g. health variables) were selected based on prior theoretical consideration.

󾱲.1
figure 1

Directed acyclic graph representing the independent effect of exposure HL on outcome ECAP, adjusted for number of children, migration background and social status, and modification of this effect by stress, allergy risk, anxiety and depression. The graph was drawn using the online application DAGitty ()

Variables that might act as moderators on the effect of mothers’ HL on ECAP comprised: allergy risk status (mother, father and/or sibling having an allergic disease (food allergy, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, atopic dermatitis): yes/no); EBI (“Eltern-Belastungs-Inventar”, [parenting stress index]) parental competence scale [27]; EBI parental bond scale [27]; PHQ-D (Patient Health Questionnaire) depression scale (PHQ-9: 0–4 = no depression, 5–9 = mild depression, 10–27 = major depression) [28], PHQ-D anxiety scale (GAD-7: question “How often have you felt affected by the following complaints in the last 4weeks? Nervousness, anxiety, tension or excessive worry” and three or more of the following questions are answered with "on more than half of the days" = yes, else = no) [28].

Variables considered as potential confounders of the effect of mothers’ HL on ECAP comprised: migration background (country of birth Germany/other); subjective social status [29]; number of children (one child/more children).

An English language version of the items considered for this analysis can be found in Supplementary file I.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data is presented as mean (standard deviation, SD), categorical data is presented in frequencies (%). Results of the regression analyses are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Selection bias was investigated by comparing general characteristics (age, education, etc.) at baseline between participants who were and were not included in the analysis sample, respectively (see Participants and data collection), using t-test, Mann–Whitney-U test and chi-square test.

The total amount of missingness throughout the dataset was 10.2%. To account for missing values multiple imputation by chained equations methods were performed using the MICE package in R [30]. Results of ten multiple imputations were combined by computing the mean or selecting the most likely imputed value and analyses were performed on this merged data set. We additionally checked for patterns and randomness of missing data.

LCA was performed to identify patterns of ECAP behaviours. LCA models identify latent classes within which observed categorical indicators follow the same distribution and probabilities for class membership are generated [31]. We fitted latent class models with one to six classes to determine the optimal number of latent classes (see Supplementary file II). The best fitting model was identified using Bayesian information criteria (BIC), Lo-Mendel-Rubin-Test (LMR) and the size of the smallest class [31].

In order to analyse the effect of mothers’ HL on ECAP, multinomial regression models were performed as we used ECAP as a variable with three distinct classes without ordered relationship. Univariable (model 0) and multivariable regression models were fitted, including different moderators as multiplicative interaction terms in the regression models (model 2: allergy risk status; model 3: parental competence; model 4: parental bond; model 5: depression; model 6: anxiety). All multivariable models were adjusted for migration background, subjective social status and number of children.

Statistical analyses were performed according to an a priori specified analysis plan [32]. The reporting follows the guidelines for reporting observational studies (STROBE statement, [33], see STROBE checklist Supplementary file III). Data were cleaned using SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0.0.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). All analyses were conducted using R version 4.1.1 (2021–08-10; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria), LCA was performed using the R package “poLCA” [34].

Results

Descriptive analyses

The total sample of mothers recruited for the KUNO-Kids health study until March 2020 comprised N = 3199. 1537 mothers were excluded due to drop-outs before 1-year assessment, N = 1662 mothers were included for analyses. The characteristics of the total sample and the analysis sample are displayed in Supplementary file IV. Compared to the drop-out sample mothers from the analysis sample were more often educated at university entrance level, married and living together with their partner, employed before pregnancy, and had less often migration background (all p &; 0.001).

In Table1 the baseline characteristics for included participants are presented. Mothers’ mean HL score at baseline was 35.83 (SD = 7.3) (Cronbach’s alpha at baseline: 0.90), more than a third (36.5%) showed limited HL (score range 0 – 32; categorization according to [35]).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants (N = 1662)

Latent class analysis

According to model fit indices a model with three classes showed the best fit (BIC = 16,967.8; LMR: LR(13) = 241.78, p < 0.001; smallest class size: 18.57%). Class 1 “breastfeeding” (N = 871) was mostly characterized by exclusively breastfeeding for at least four months, class 2 “allergen-avoidance” (N = 490) by a lower probability for breastfeeding and more pronounced avoidance of allergens and class 3 “mixed behaviours” (N = 301) by a similar pattern to class 1 but a lower probability of exclusively breastfeeding. Results are displayed in Fig.2.

󾱲.2
figure 2

Results of latent class analysis: class 1 “breastfeeding” (N = 871), class 2 “allergen-avoidance” (N = 490), class 3 “mixed behaviours” (N = 301). Variables included in LCA:fish as part of mothers’ diet during pregnancy (≥ 1 per week vs. < 1 per week); duration of exclusively breastfeeding (≥ 4months vs. no breastfeeding/ < 4months); regular feeding of hydrolysed infant formula (hydrolysed formula vs. other formula); child’s age of introduction of any solid foods (4–6months vs. < 4months/ > 6months); allergy prevention related avoidance of feeding specific foods in the child’s diet during the first year of life (yes vs. no); fish as part of solid foods during the child’s first year of life (≥ 1 per week vs. < 1 per week); feeding of farm milk (yes vs. no); exposure to tobacco smoke (yes vs. no); measures for reducing house dust mites (yes (any) vs. no).

Regression analyses

In the univariable model (model 0), compared to class “breastfeeding”, class “allergen-avoidance” was negatively (OR = 0.968, p < 0.001), and class “mixed behaviours” was not associated (OR = 0.999, p = 0.905) with mothers’ HL. After adjustment for confounders (model 1) class “allergen-avoidance” was still negatively (OR = 0.971, p < 0.001) and class “mixed behaviours” not associated (OR = 1.00, p = 0.603) with HL.

Models 2 to 6 included each a moderator variable, however, in none of these models the association between mothers’ HL and ECAP behaviours was significantly altered by the moderator variable (allergy risk status, parental competence, parental bond, depression or anxiety). Trends were visible for parental bond (class “mixed behaviours”: OR = 0.995, p = 0.085) and mild depression (class “allergen-avoidance”: OR = 0.968, p = 0.072). Results are presented in Table2.

Table 2 Regression models for the association between HL and ECAP (class “breastfeeding” as reference) (N = 1662)

As moderation analyses did not reveal significant results the final multivariable model is model 1.Model 1 was significantly different to the univariable model. The amount of explained variance was small (McFadden’s pseudo-R2 = 0.01).

Discussion

We showed an effect of mothers’ HL on ECAP behaviours: lower HL led mothers to behaviours such as feeding hypoallergenic infant milk, avoiding specific foods in the child’s diet during the first year of life or implementing measures against house dust mites. The size of the effect was small but remained statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounding variables. None of the potentially moderating variables we tested significantly altered the effect of mothers’ HL on ECAP behaviours.

We identified different patterns of behaviours that are practiced in families in Germany in relation to ECAP. When comparing our classes to recommendations the class “breastfeeding” includes behaviours that mostly reflect current recommendations, the class “allergen-avoidance” encompasses behaviours that are discouraged in guidelines since 2014 [13, 14]. It is remarkable that a considerable proportion of mothers still avoid allergens in the diet and home environment of their child.

Our finding of an effect of HL on ECAP behaviours contributes to the large body of evidence on high parental HL and favourable health behaviours [4]. However, our goal to identify additional variables probably influencing the effect of HL on health behaviours was not achieved. Neither allergy risk status, nor mothers’ bond, competence, depression or anxiety were moderators of the effect of HL on ECAP, respectively. Thus, we can assume that HL is related to ECAP behaviours, regardless of whether a child is at-risk of allergy or not at-risk, whether mothers have high or low parental competence, strong or weak child bonding or present symptoms of mental disorders.

Our study makes a unique contribution to the field of HL research in childhood allergy prevention. We did not restrict our analyses to single behaviours, but we operationalized ECAP as a broad set of several specific health behaviours that might be related to allergy prevention, regardless of whether they are currently recommended or not. This comprehensive perspective acknowledges that ECAP touches many different areas of child care, in contrast to previous studies that focused mostly on associations between HL and specific allergy prevention related behaviours [19,20,21].

Especially health professionals involved in the counselling of families during pregnancy or the first months could support parents in accessing, understanding, appraising and applying information about child health and ECAP, respectively. However, HL-sensitive and HL-supportive counselling techniques are only poorly used which often leads to a systematic overestimation of parental HL and, as a result, a lack of knowledge among parents [36, 37]. Subsequently, parents often base health-related decisions on other sources like asking peers or intuition [38]. Developing comprehensible evidence-based ECAP information and providing easy access for families might be helpful. In addition, there is further potential to strengthen parents’ HL through specific interventions. Until now, HL interventions are still underutilized, though recent studies already addressed different HL dimensions like enhancing access and utilization of health information or support services. Particularly, home- and community-based programs as well as interventions delivered by midwives, public health nurses, community-health workers and trained peer mothers played a crucial role in developing trust, social support and overcoming barriers in accessing and utilizing health care and support services [39].

Strengths and limitations

The analyses of this study as well as the selection of moderating and confounding variables were based on previous literature, a conceptual model of HL [1], and DAGs methodology. A statistical analysis plan was registered a priori [32]. Mothers’ HL was assessed using the health care scale of the HLS-EU-Q47, a common validated standardized questionnaire. For feasability reasons only a subscale with 16 items was used. It consists of self-ratings about how easy or difficult people perceive their dealing with health information. Possibly social desirability or misjudgement of competences could have biased the results. Additionally, data collection within the KUNO-Kids health study is extensive causing missing values. For missing values that were detected in the analysis sample we applied multiple imputation in order to use all available information without the need of listwise deletion of participants with missing values in single variables. Further, selection bias through drop-out is a common problem in cohort studies. Participants who dropped out during the first year of the study were characterized by lower sociodemographic levels. Despite the use of statistical imputation methods, it is important to interpret the results with caution and recognize that they may not be applicable to mothers with different sociodemographic characteristics. While it is a strength of our study that we adopted a comprehensive perspective on ECAP, this approach also entails limitations. Breastfeeding, which was the most prominent variable in the pattern of class 1, is generally important for the health of both mother and child and is part of various child health recommendations that do not specifically focus on ECAP [40, 41]. As a result, it is unclear whether mothers assigned to class 1 “breastfeeding” are intentionally engaging in ECAP behaviours or are more likely to engage in general health behaviours. Therefore, further research is needed to understand when and how parental HL translates into health behaviours or ECAP. Additionally, future studies should consider other variables that might contribute to the effect of HL on ECAP, as the amount of explained variance in our models was quite small. Due to the availability of variables in the study, not all potentially relevant variables based on recent literature and theoretical considerations could be included in the DAG. We acknowledge that this does not reflect a perfect DAG with all possible variables and pathways, and further research is needed to address this limitation.

Conclusions

Mothers’ HL had an effect on ECAP behaviours. Improving HL could contribute to the implementation of recommended ECAP behaviours in families, especially to the reduction of allergen-avoiding behaviours. However, further research on underlying relations is needed as the included moderators in our analyses did not contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms between HL and health behaviours.

Availability of data and materials

Data analysed for this study can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sørensen K, van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan JM, Slonska Z, Brand H. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. ӣƵ. 2012;12:80. .

  2. Morrison AK, Glick A, Yin HS. Health Literacy: Implications for Child Health. Pediatr Rev. 2019;40(6):263–77. .

  3. Nawabi F, Krebs F, Vennedey V, Shukri A, Lorenz L, Stock S. Health Literacy in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7). .

  4. Pawellek M, Kopf FM, Egger N, Dresch C, Matterne U, Brandstetter S. Pathways linking parental health literacy with health behaviours directed at the child: A scoping review. Health Promot Int. 2021. .

  5. Aharon AA, Nehama H, Rishpon S, Baron-Epel O. Parents with high levels of communicative and critical health literacy are less likely to vaccinate their children. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(4):768–75. .

  6. Lee JY, Divaris K, DeWalt DA, Baker AD, Gizlice Z, Rozier RG, Vann WF. Caregivers’ health literacy and gaps in children’s Medicaid enrollment: Findings from the Carolina Oral Health Literacy Study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10): e110178. .

    CAS

  7. Lee J-Y, Murry N, Ko J, Kim MT. Exploring the Relationship between Maternal Health Literacy, Parenting Self-Efficacy, and Early Parenting Practices among Low-Income Mothers with Infants. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(4):1455–71. .

  8. Williams TA, Wolf MS, Parker RM, Sanders LM, Bailey S, Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, Velazquez JJ, Yin HS. Parent Dosing Tool Use, Beliefs, and Access: A Health Literacy Perspective. J Pediatr. 2019;215:244-251.e1. .

  9. Cudjoe J, Delva S, Cajita M, Han H-R. Empirically Tested Health Literacy Frameworks. Health Lit Res Pract. 2020;4(1):e22–44. .

  10. Johri M, Subramanian SV, Sylvestre M-P, Dudeja S, Chandra D, Koné GK, Sharma JK, Pahwa S. Association between maternal health literacy and child vaccination in India: A cross-sectional study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(9):849–57. .

  11. Du Toit G, Katz Y, Sasieni P, Mesher D, Maleki SJ, Fisher HR, Fox AT, Turcanu V, Amir T, Zadik-Mnuhin G, Cohen A, Livne I, Lack G. Early consumption of peanuts in infancy is associated with a low prevalence of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(5):984–91. .

    CAS

  12. Du Toit G, Roberts G, Sayre PH, Bahnson HT, Radulovic S, Santos AF, Brough H, Phippard D, Basting M, Feeney M, Turcanu V, Sever ML, Gomez Lorenzo M, Plaut M, Lack G. Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):803–13. .

    CAS

  13. Kopp MV, Muche-Borowski C, Abou-Dakn M, Ahrens B, Beyer K, Blümchen K, Bubel P, Chaker A, Cremer M, Ensenauer R, Gerstlauer M, Gieler U, Hübner IM, Horak F, Klimek L, Koletzko BV, Koletzko S, Lau S, Lob-Corzilius T, Hamelmann E. S3 guideline Allergy Prevention. Allergologie Select. 2022;6:61–97. .

  14. Schäfer T, Bauer C-P, Beyer K, Bufe A, Friedrichs F, Gieler U, Gronke G, Hamelmann E, Hellermann M, Kleinheinz A, Klimek L, Koletzko S, Kopp M, Lau S, Müsken H, Reese I, Schmidt S, Schnadt S, Sitter H, Muche-Borowski C. S3-Guideline on allergy prevention: 2014 update: Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) and the German Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ). Allergo Journal International. 2014;23(6):186–99. .

  15. Kuper P, Hasenpusch C, Proebstl S, Matterne U, Hornung CJ, Grätsch E, Li M, Sprenger AA, Pieper D, Koplin JJ, Perkin MR, Genuneit J, Apfelbacher C. Timing of Complementary Feeding for Early Childhood Allergy Prevention: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. MedRxiv. 2023;2023.06.13.23290959. .

  16. Karvonen AM, Hyvärinen A, Rintala H, Korppi M, Täubel M, Doekes G, Gehring U, Renz H, Pfefferle PI, Genuneit J, Keski-Nisula L, Remes S, Lampi J, von Mutius E, Pekkanen J. Quantity and diversity of environmental microbial exposure and development of asthma: A birth cohort study. Allergy. 2014;69(8):1092–101. .

    CAS

  17. O’Connor GT, Lynch SV, Bloomberg GR, Kattan M, Wood RA, Gergen PJ, Jaffee KF, Calatroni A, Bacharier LB, Beigelman A, Sandel MT, Johnson CC, Faruqi A, Santee C, Fujimura KE, Fadrosh D, Boushey H, Visness CM, Gern JE. Early-life home environment and risk of asthma among inner-city children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(4):1468–75. .

  18. Pawellek M, Köninger A, Melter M, Kabesch M, Apfelbacher C, Brandstetter S. Early childhood allergy prevention behaviors: Trends in Germany from 2015 to 2020. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2023;34(4):e13948. .

  19. Graus TM, Brandstetter S, Seelbach-Göbel B, Melter M, Kabesch M, Apfelbacher C, Fill Malfertheiner S. Breastfeeding behavior is not associated with health literacy: Evidence from the German KUNO-Kids birth cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(5):1161–8. .

    CAS

  20. Cheng ER, Bauer NS, Downs SM, Sanders LM. Parent health literacy, depression, and risk for pediatric injury. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1). .

  21. Smedberg J, Lupattelli A, Mårdby A-C, Nordeng H. Characteristics of women who continue smoking during pregnancy: A cross-sectional study of pregnant women and new mothers in 15 European countries. ӣƵ Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:213. .

  22. Brandstetter S, Toncheva AA, Niggel J, Wolff C, Gran S, Seelbach-Göbel B, Apfelbacher CJ, Melter M, Kabesch M. Kuno-Kids birth cohort study: Rationale, design, and cohort description. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2019;6(1):1. .

  23. Sørensen K, van den Broucke S, Pelikan JM, &, et al. Measuring health literacy in populations: Illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). ӣƵ. 2013;13:948. .

  24. Schaeffer D, Vogt D, Berens E-M, Hurrelmann K. Gesundheitskompetenz der Bevölkerung in Deutschland - Ergebnisbericht [Health literacy in the German population - result report]. Universität Bielefeld, Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften. 2016. .

  25. HLS-EU Consortium. Comparative Report of health literacy in Eight EU Member States: The European Health Literacy Survey HLS-EU. 2012. .

  26. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiol (Cambridge, Mass). 1999;10(1):37–48.

    CAS

  27. Tröster H. Eltern-Belastungs-Inventar [parenting stress index]: Manual [EBI. Parenting Stress Index]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2010.

  28. Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S, Herzog W. Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D): Komplettversion und Kurzform. Testmappe mit Manual, Fragebögen, Schablonen (2. Auflage). Karlsruhe: Pfizer; 2002.

  29. Hoebel J, Müters S, Kuntz B, Lange C, Lampert T. Messung des subjektiven sozialen Status in der Gesundheitsforschung mit einer deutschen Version der MacArthur Scale [Measuring subjective social status in health research with a German version of the MacArthur Scale]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58(7):749–57. .

  30. Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C. MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J Stat Software. 2011;45. .

  31. Sinha P, Calfee CS, Delucchi KL. Practitioner’s Guide to Latent Class Analysis: Methodological Considerations and Common Pitfalls. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(1):e63–79. .

  32. Pawellek M, Brandstetter S. Association between mothers‘ health literacy and early childhood allergy prevention. Open Science Framework. 2023. .

  33. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (London, England). 2007;370(9596):1453–7. .

  34. Linzer D, Lewis J. Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis. 2022. .

  35. Schaeffer D, Berens E-M, Vogt D. Health literacy in the German population. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(4):53–60. .

  36. Dickens C, Lambert BL, Cromwell T, Piano MR. Nurse overestimation of patients’ health literacy. J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):62–9. .

  37. Sommoggy J von, Grepmeier E‑M, Curbach J. Health Literacy-Sensitive Counselling on Early Childhood Allergy Prevention: Results of a Qualitative Study on German Midwives' Perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7). .

  38. Lander J, Bitzer EM, Sommoggy J von, Pawellek M, Hala A, John C, Apfelbacher C, Dierks M‑L. How do parents access, appraise, and apply health information on early childhood allergy prevention? A focus group and interview study. Front Public Health. 2023;11. .

  39. Melwani S, Cleland V, Patterson K, Nash R. A scoping review: Global health literacy interventions for pregnant women and mothers with young children. Health Promot Int. 2021. .

  40. Koletzko B, Bauer C-P, Cierpka M, Cremer M, Flothkötter M, Graf C, Heindl I, Hellmers C, Kersting M, Krawinkel M, Przyrembel H, Vetter K, Weißenborn A, Wöckel A. Ernährung und Bewegung von Säuglingen und stillenden Frauen. [Nutrition and exercise for infants and breastfeeding women]. Monatsschr Kinderh. 2016;164(S5):433–57. .

  41. World Health Organisation. Exclusive breastfeeding for six months best for babies everywhere. World Health Organization. 2011. .

Acknowledgements

We thank all families for their participation in the study and all members of the KUNO-Kids study group: Andreas Ambrosch (Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology and Hygiene, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital, Regensburg, Germany), Petra A. Arndt (ZNL Transfercenter of Neuroscience and Learning, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany), Andrea Baessler (Department of Internal Medicine II, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany), Mark Berneburg (Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Stephan Böse-O’Reilly (University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John, Regensburg, Germany), Romuald Brunner (Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg (medbo), Regensburg, Germany), Sara Fill Malfertheiner (Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Hedwig, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), André Franke (Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany), Robert Häsler (Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany), Sebastian Häusler (Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Hedwig, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Iris Heid (Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Stefanie Heinze (Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL) Munich, Germany), Wolfgang Högler (Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria), Sebastian Kerzel (Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergy, University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John, Regensburg, Germany), Michael Koller (Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Michael Leitzmann (Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Áine Lennon (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), David Rothfuß (City of Regensburg, Coordinating Center for Early Interventions, Regensburg, Germany), Wolfgang Rösch (Department of Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany), Bianca Schaub (Pediatric Allergology, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany), Stephan Weidinger (Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany) and Sven Wellmann (Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John, Regensburg, Germany).

Code availability

Code for the analyses can be obtained from the corresponding author.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Grant FOR 2959 “HELICAP” (project number 409800133), BR 5081/2–1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MP drafted the statistical analysis plan, performed data analysis, interpreted the study findings, drafted the manuscript, critically evaluated the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. AK critically evaluated the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. MM contributed to data collection, critically evaluated the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. MK designed the study and contributed to data collection. He critically evaluated the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. CA designed the study and provided feedback to the statistical analysis plan. He critically evaluated the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. SB designed the study, and contributed to the statistical analysis plan, data analysis, interpretation of study findings, manuscript writing, and revision of the manuscript. She critically evaluated the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maja Pawellek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The KUNO-Kids study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (Reference Numbers: 14–101-0347, 19–1646-101). Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Data was fully anonymized so that no one can be identified via the paper.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit .

About this article

Cite this article

Pawellek, M., Köninger, A., Melter, M. et al. Effect of mothers‘ health literacy on early childhood allergy prevention behaviours: results from the KUNO-Kids health study. ӣƵ 24, 2420 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19906-8

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19906-8

Keywords