Mental health profiles of 15-year-old adolescents in the Nordic Countries from 2002 to 2022: person-oriented analyses

Table 11 Differences in comparison measures between mental health profiles using psychosomatic complaints and low life satisfaction as clustering variables

听	Adequate mental听health	Perceived good mental health	Perceived poor health	High psychosomatic complaints	Dual health problems	Eta²
Feel stressed	0.06^d	-0.32^e	0.25^c	0.39^b	0.97^a	0.12
Feel lonely	-0.07^d	-0.37^e	0.30^c	0.49^b	1.11^a	0.17
Regular health habits	-0.05^c	0.27^d	-0.38^b	-0.08^c	-0.56^a	0.13
Good parent communication	0.00^d	0.21^e	-0.26^b	-0.21^c	-0.60^a	0.11
Like school	0.03^d	0.23^e	-0.25^c	-0.36^b	-0.81^a	0.07
Taking medication	-0.10^c	-0.10^c	0.29^b	0.20^b	0.46^a	0.13
Family is well off	-0.03^c	0.22^d	-0.31^b	-0.07^c	-0.51^a	0.04

Comparison measures are transformed into Z-scores
There are significant differences, at the .001 level, in all comparisons. Hence, eta², as a measure of effect size, is reported
eta² value .01 is small, .06 is medium, and .14 is large effect size
Different superscripts ^{a b c} represent significant differences (p鈥�<鈥�.05) between the four cluster groups employing Student Neuman Keul鈥檚 post-hoc test. The Dual health problems group is consistently designated superscript ^a

ISSN: 1471-2458