Ó£»¨ÊÓƵ

Skip to main content

Table 1 PLA intervention effects on primary and secondary outcomes

From: Understanding multilevel barriers to childhood vaccination uptake among Internally Displaced Populations (IDPs) in Mogadishu, Somalia: a qualitative study

ÌýÌý

Adjusted prevalence or mean score (95% CI)

Adjusted Regression Model

ÌýÌý

Control

hPLA

ÌýÌýÌý

Trial arm

Ìý

Baseline

Endline

Baseline

Endline

aOR or Score

(95% CI)

P-value

Primary outcomes

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Caregiver knowledge score1

7.79

(6.66, 8.92)

8.02

(6.76, 9.27)

8.24

(7.33, 9.14)

16.36

(15.73, 17.00)

7.89

(6.93, 8.85)

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

Measles vaccination (%)2

63.6

(52.4, 75.0)

69.8

(59.2, 75.5)

67.9

(60.3, 75.5)

86.6

(80.5, 92.7)

2.43

(1.96, 3.01)

&±ô³Ù; 0.0001

Penta series completion (%)3

62.2

(54.2, 73.0)

68.0

(57.7, 78.3)

65.4

(54.4, 76.4)

85.4

(76.7, 94.0)

2.45

(1.27, 4.74)

0.008

Timely EPI vaccination (%)4

39.7

(28.1, 51.4)

37.5

(29.0, 46.0)

39.7

(29.0, 46.0)

40.0

(15.1, 64.9)

1.12

(0.39, 3.26)

0.828

Vaccination preference (%)5

95.8

(91.4, 100)

96.4

(93.6, 99.1)

95.2

(91.3, 99.1)

99.4

(98.4, 100)

2.30

(-0.33, 4.93)

0.086

Secondary outcome

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Child health record card (%)4

18.9

(8.9, 28.8)

21.3

(18.5, 24.1)

18.0

(10.7, 25.3)

35.3

(28.6, 42.0)

2.86

(1.35, 6.06)

0.006

  1. In all analyses, except caregiver knowledge and vaccination preference, results are adjusted for child age and sex, and the baseline
  2. value of the outcome variable. For caregiver knowledge and vaccination preference results were adjusted for age, educational status, previous vaccination of the caregiver, and baseline responses
  3. 1 We assessed impact in mothers/caregivers using linear regression and we report the adjusted regression coefficient. Possible scores ranged from 0–21
  4. 2 We assessed impact in children aged 9–59 months using logistic regression and we report the adjusted odds ratio
  5. 3 Impact was assessed in children aged 12–27 months using logistic regression and we report the adjusted odds ratio
  6. 4 We assessed impact in children aged 0–59 months using logistic regression and we report the adjusted odds ratio
  7. 5 We assessed impact in mothers/caregivers using logistic regression and we report the adjusted odds ratio