Table 3 Gender specific prevalence of HSV-2 infection by district and place of residence*
From: Heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic in the general population of Karnataka state, south India
| 听 | N | Belgaum (N=502) % (95% CI) | Bellary (N=475) % (95% CI) | Mysore (N=436) % (95% CI) | P-value$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urban Total | 652 | 7.54 (3.91-11.17) | 10.10 (7.15-13.05) | 9.56 (4.09-15.03) | 0.406 |
Urban Males | 322 | 4.00 (0.55-7.45) | 6.37 (1.49-11.24) | 7.98 (1.97-13.98) | 0.318 |
Urban Females | 330 | 11.53 (5.67-17.39) | 13.33 (6.82-19.85) | 11.01 (4.12-17.89) | 0.835 |
Rural Total | 761 | 19.87 (13.87-25.87) | 12.31 (8.66-15.96) | 11.80 (5.58-18.03) | 0.452 |
Rural Males | 367 | 11.43 (4.18-18.69) | 7.37 (2.27-12.47) | 9.64 (2.66-16.63) | 0.834 |
Rural Females | 394 | 27.96 (17.10-38.83) | 17.09 (11.38-22.80) | 13.83 (3.24-24.41) | 0.431 |
All total | 1413 | 16.93 (12.25-21.61) | 11.38 (8.93-13.82) | 10.89 (6.54-15.23) | 0.929 |
Males | 689 | 9.55 (4.09-15.01) | 6.96 (3.51-10.41) | 8.97 (4.56-14.09) | 0.601 |
Females | 724 | 24.29 (16.37-32.20) | 15.46 (11.25-19.66) | 12.67 (6.12-19.21) | 0.707 |